| 1 |
On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 18:17 -0600, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 2 |
> > The arch teams are notified, but the same thing happens again and again |
| 3 |
> > and that has to lead to this thread. |
| 4 |
> > About your problem & fixing : that's the whole deal, it is general |
| 5 |
> > issues that slip trough this way, so it's the package maintainers |
| 6 |
> > responsibility. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Examples? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Numerous. in the gnome case recently gtk+, *mm packages, ORBit2 ... over |
| 11 |
a longer period of time many more things. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > You skip things around. It is not the 'maintainers arch' that is QA-ing |
| 14 |
> > for an arch it does not maintain, it's the 'arch maintainer' thats skips |
| 15 |
> > part of QA done by the 'package maintainer'. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Examples? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
This is theory, no examples. You interpret the situation the wrong way |
| 20 |
around to begin with, so please get that right. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Anyway your call for examples is misguided in itself, because it's a |
| 23 |
tendency I'm trying to keep from leading to big QA problems. The |
| 24 |
problems so far have been minor or were fixed in time. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- foser |
Archives