| 1 |
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 09:36, foser wrote: |
| 2 |
> > > You skip things around. It is not the 'maintainers arch' that is QA-ing |
| 3 |
> > > for an arch it does not maintain, it's the 'arch maintainer' thats skips |
| 4 |
> > > part of QA done by the 'package maintainer'. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Examples? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
net-p2p/mldonkey- I refuse to mark >2.5.16 stable because of numerous |
| 9 |
bug reports and stability problems with the newer versions (though the |
| 10 |
latest version in portage does seem a bit more stable). Completely |
| 11 |
ignoring this, those versions are on the "stable on hppa". It's not a |
| 12 |
majorly critical package, but it is an example of the QA done by the |
| 13 |
maintainer, and the arch maintainer going beyond it. I don't mind much, |
| 14 |
because I have yet to get a bug report from an hppa user, but I would |
| 15 |
have prefered to keep it all testing until for at least another month. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-Jon |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
AIM: Squinky01 |
| 21 |
Yahoo!: Squinky86 |
| 22 |
ICQ: 160940989 |
| 23 |
Jabber: squinky86@×××××××××.org |
Archives