| 1 |
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:47:08PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
*snip* |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Both of which are correct. That being said, I am not against making |
| 6 |
> changes, but given that this is on the list, I would like to someone to |
| 7 |
> provide a technical justification. Some key questions that justification |
| 8 |
> should answer are "what capability does this provide to sysytemd that |
| 9 |
> cannot be obtained without this change? and "what does that do for |
| 10 |
> users"? So far, the only thing that I have read is "systemd wants it", |
| 11 |
> which answers neither question. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
A quick google for per-process namespaces turns up this lwn series: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
http://lwn.net/Articles/531114/ |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
This functionality can't be fully supported if /etc/mtab is a file. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
William |
Archives