1 |
On 10/14/2013 10:46 AM, Richard Yao wrote: |
2 |
> My main concern is that some of the configure flags being proposed could |
3 |
> make packages that worked on Gentoo FreeBSD stop working there. I am not |
4 |
> making changes, but I think that there should be some benefit and that |
5 |
> care should be taken not to break things for everyone else. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> That being said, mgorny said that this adds support for mount |
8 |
> namespaces, but I have yet to hear an explanation of what that actually |
9 |
> means. What are the use cases? |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
Someone brought to my attention that there was a slight error in the |
13 |
above message. I had meant to write "I am not against making changes..." |
14 |
rather than "I am not making changes...". |
15 |
|
16 |
In hindsight, the statement that "I am not making changes" was a more |
17 |
profound statement than the one that I meant to write because it can be |
18 |
interpreted in any of two ways: |
19 |
|
20 |
1. It could be interpreted as meaning that I intend to oppose proposed |
21 |
changes when they have no benefit and I have the ability to oppose them. |
22 |
2. It could be interpreted as meaning that I am not one of the people |
23 |
who make decisions for the packages involved. Consequently, my opinion |
24 |
here only matters to the extent that those who make decisions are |
25 |
willing to consider it. |
26 |
|
27 |
Both of which are correct. That being said, I am not against making |
28 |
changes, but given that this is on the list, I would like to someone to |
29 |
provide a technical justification. Some key questions that justification |
30 |
should answer are "what capability does this provide to sysytemd that |
31 |
cannot be obtained without this change? and "what does that do for |
32 |
users"? So far, the only thing that I have read is "systemd wants it", |
33 |
which answers neither question. |