| 1 |
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:35:25 -0700 |
| 2 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Did anyone already propose specifying this in metadata.xml? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Yup. That's a no-go, since metadata.xml is quite rightly treated as |
| 6 |
being "not suitable for anything the package manager really needs". |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It also moves the EAPI definition even further away from the ebuild, |
| 9 |
which makes it even harder to work with. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
And, of course, it's not backwards compatible, so it'd still need a |
| 12 |
file extension change. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives