| 1 |
Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 17:48:15 |
| 2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> fhs 3.0 was approved in June this year [1] [2]. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> The piece of it that I want to bring up is the lib and libxx |
| 7 |
> directories, both in / and /usr. The way I read the fhs, /lib and |
| 8 |
> /usr/lib should hold the files for the default abi and /libxx and |
| 9 |
> /usr/libxx should hold the files for the alternate abis. In earlier fhs, |
| 10 |
> there was an exception for amd64 which stated that the default libraries |
| 11 |
> should be in /lib64 and /usr/lib64. However, that exception is now gone. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I've talked to William about this yesterday. And raised two major |
| 14 |
points. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Firstly, I think that this paragraph can be interpreted as 64-bit ABI |
| 17 |
being an alternative ABI to x86 architecture. This follows the late |
| 18 |
trend of treating amd64 as a superset of x86 rather than something |
| 19 |
completely new. This also fits ppc64 > ppc, s390x > s390 etc. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Secondly, I think that the ABI standards are more relevant than FHS. |
| 22 |
And they clearly state that: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
- /lib is for x86 ABI, |
| 25 |
- /lib64 is for x86_64, |
| 26 |
- /libx32 is for x32. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Michał Górny |
| 31 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives