1 |
Wouter van Kleunen <kleunen@××××××××××.nl> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I wrote a new init system that has numerous advantages over the old script |
4 |
> based init system. Please have a look at: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> pinit.sf.net |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I am a gentoo user, and i converted my scripts -> services for my |
9 |
> system. I would like to have feedback on this system. Please try it |
10 |
> out on your system (safely from your home directory). |
11 |
|
12 |
converting init-scripts to XML is a scary process. init-scripts |
13 |
should IMHO be human readable, as atomic as possible, and testable |
14 |
without depending on much more than having a generic shell. in |
15 |
addition to verboseness and lack of readability, XML makes it |
16 |
"interesting" to integrate more complex scripts, like autofs. |
17 |
|
18 |
yes, XML is easier to generate for a machine, but you generally |
19 |
don't generate init-scripts, if you do you probably build them from |
20 |
templates, which aren't XML friendly either. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Terje |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |