Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Geert Bevin <gbevin@×××××××.be>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked portage 1.8.8-r1
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 11:07:04
Message-Id: 1012755939.947.1.camel@inspiron.theleaf.office
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked portage 1.8.8-r1 by Vitaly Kushneriuk
1 I thought about this, but didn't implement it that way since portage
2 seems to be 'greedy' by default. With that I mean that '--pretend' also
3 has to be explicitly specified to prevent actions from happening.
4 Therefor I think it's more logical to have to specify '--safe'
5 explicitly too.
6
7 On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 06:29, Vitaly Kushneriuk wrote:
8 > > *portage 1.8.8 (1 Feb 2002)
9 > >
10 > > 1 Feb 2002; G.Bevin <gbevin@g.o> emerge :
11 > > added --safe switch to complement the --unmerge option
12 > IMO --safe should be default, with --force to override it.
13 > Just my 0.02$ ;)
14 > /Vitaly
15 > _______________________________________________
16 > gentoo-dev mailing list
17 > gentoo-dev@g.o
18 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
19 >
20 --
21 Geert Bevin
22 the Leaf sprl/bvba
23 "Use what you need" Pierre Theunisstraat 1/47
24 http://www.theleaf.be 1030 Brussels
25 gbevin@×××××××.be Tel & Fax +32 2 241 19 98

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] masked portage 1.8.8-r1 Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] masked portage 1.8.8-r1 Vitaly Kushneriuk <vitaly_kushneriuk@×××××.com>