Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Vitaly Kushneriuk <vitaly_kushneriuk@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked portage 1.8.8-r1
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 01:09:15
Message-Id: 1012806507.10846.1.camel@uranus.u235.eyep.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked portage 1.8.8-r1 by Geert Bevin
1 Yes, but emerge is not as dangerous as unmerge.
2
3 On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 19:05, Geert Bevin wrote:
4 > I thought about this, but didn't implement it that way since portage
5 > seems to be 'greedy' by default. With that I mean that '--pretend' also
6 > has to be explicitly specified to prevent actions from happening.
7 > Therefor I think it's more logical to have to specify '--safe'
8 > explicitly too.
9 >
10 > On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 06:29, Vitaly Kushneriuk wrote:
11 > > > *portage 1.8.8 (1 Feb 2002)
12 > > >
13 > > > 1 Feb 2002; G.Bevin <gbevin@g.o> emerge :
14 > > > added --safe switch to complement the --unmerge option
15 > > IMO --safe should be default, with --force to override it.
16 > > Just my 0.02$ ;)
17 > > /Vitaly
18 > > _______________________________________________
19 > > gentoo-dev mailing list
20 > > gentoo-dev@g.o
21 > > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
22 > >
23 > --
24 > Geert Bevin
25 > the Leaf sprl/bvba
26 > "Use what you need" Pierre Theunisstraat 1/47
27 > http://www.theleaf.be 1030 Brussels
28 > gbevin@×××××××.be Tel & Fax +32 2 241 19 98
29 >
30 > _______________________________________________
31 > gentoo-dev mailing list
32 > gentoo-dev@g.o
33 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev