Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags | ||
| Date: | Fri, 07 Jul 2006 13:43:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 44AE6360.8080504@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags by Chris Gianelloni |
||
| 1 | Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 | [snip] |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > This means it is now 36 profiles to support, if we dropped support on |
| 5 | > all profiles except for the new ones. Without having any sort of |
| 6 | > multiple inheritance available, this is really unmanageable. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | This is exactly the same reason why amd64 won't move to a per CPU |
| 10 | subprofile. it might be a good idea for ppc, but not for us. |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] CPU subprofiles (was: Replacing cpu-feature USE flags) | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> |