Archives
Archives
| From: | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. | ||
| Date: | Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:35:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAATnKFCg8vbgtsgUw4z_aVxJdFM+bL2BEZtzXYdrFS-XyQ-MsA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On 15 September 2015 at 06:54, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | >> I think it'd be okay to e.g. change the meaning and behavior of * in |
| 4 | >> a new EAPI. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Bug 560466 now. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Assuming the syntax can be changed in a future EAPI. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | What EAPI applies to the use of these specifiers on the command line? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | What EAPI applies to the use of these specifiers in /etc/portage/** ? |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | Kent |
| 19 | |
| 20 | KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |