Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. | ||
| Date: | Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:54:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 22007.6124.650634.304655@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. by "Paweł Hajdan | ||
| 1 | >>>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Paweł Hajdan, wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I agree =pkg-4.1* also matching pkg-4.10 is a concern. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > In that case though, it would change the focus of the discussion to |
| 6 | > how * operator should work, not necessarily adding a new ~> |
| 7 | > operator. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > I think it'd be okay to e.g. change the meaning and behavior of * in |
| 10 | > a new EAPI. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Bug 560466 now. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |