Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:17:31
Message-Id: 20050628131256.2d26882c@sven.genone.homeip.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project by Anders Hellgren
1 On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:37:46 +0200 (MEST)
2 Anders Hellgren <andh@××××××××××××××××××××××××××.se> wrote:
3
4 > > Currently I'd be interested if there are any solid numbers how many
5 > > global moderators/admins want/don't want to get staff status?
6 >
7 > Let's see, all admins and global mods are in the Global Moderators
8 > group. To the best of my knowledge the staus is the following.
9 >
10 > Nitro: Not necessary, [1]
11 > amne: Will take
12 > BonezTheGoon: Don't know, inactive
13 > curtis119: Has recently taken it
14 > Deathwing00: /me is getting confused by his replies in this thread,
15 > the main authors of the glep never intended anyone to become Gentoo
16 > staff without taking the staff quiz.
17 > Earthwings: Will take
18 > ian!: Will take
19 > kallamej: Will take
20 > klieber: Not necessary, [1]
21 > Maedhros: Will take
22 > masseya: Don't know, but he thinks the glep is a really good idea.
23 > phong: Don't know, inactive
24 > pilla: Reluctant, but hasn't said he would refuse.
25 > pjp: Not necessary, [1]
26 > plate: Not necessary, [1]
27 > puggy: Not necessary, [1]
28 > rac: Not necessary, [1]
29 > tomk: Not necessary, [1]
30
31 So that would be 6 "will take", 2 inactive (should be handled like
32 retired devs IMO), 8 "not necessary" and 2 more or less unknown. No
33 "definite against". So after all the whole discussion might be a non-
34 issue ;)
35
36 Marius
37
38 --
39 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
40
41 In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
42 Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.