1 |
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:30:31AM +0100, Philippe Namias wrote: |
2 |
> Hi all, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Just for telling that i just emerge during all the weekend and nearly install |
5 |
> all the package using emerge. So far with no problem. |
6 |
|
7 |
Wonderful. :) |
8 |
|
9 |
> But i have a few question : |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Why after merging a packages we leave data in /tmp/portage/package_name ? |
12 |
|
13 |
Right now, Portage works this way because it's been used by developers who |
14 |
may need to look in /tmp/portage later to track down build problems. Soon, |
15 |
we'll have an "auto-cleanup" Portage option that will be on by default. |
16 |
|
17 |
> Is it normal that i can do emerge packgae_name as many time that i want ? |
18 |
|
19 |
For now, yes. At some point soon, this will change. (When we add MULTIPLE |
20 |
version management features) |
21 |
|
22 |
> For example if i run it twice emerge on gtk-xemacs i run into trouble telling |
23 |
> me xemacs can't find the root for data, lib. The only that i found to restore |
24 |
> gtk-xemacs is to erase the directory /var/db/packages/apps-editor/gtk-xemacs |
25 |
> and also /tmp/portage/gtk-xemacs? Any idea? |
26 |
|
27 |
Yes, I have an idea. There was a bug in an earlier version of Portage where |
28 |
the new files didn't get "touched" (so their mtimes were updated). For many |
29 |
packages, this caused the auto-unmerge to remove way too many things. It's |
30 |
been fixed now, so you may want to check to see if you're using the latest |
31 |
version of ebuild. Be careful, because Achim is having trouble with the most |
32 |
recent version on CVS. I'm working on an even more dramatically different |
33 |
version right now on our server, and I'll commit it once I make sure that it's |
34 |
working well. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
38 |
President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org |
39 |
Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |