Archives
Archives
| From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. | ||
| Date: | Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:48:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 55F6B3F7.4050606@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On 09/14/2015 01:46 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Interesting. So Portage follows the wording of the spec (prefix string |
| 4 | > matching), whereas Paludis behaves like (IMHO) the spec should have |
| 5 | > been written. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | The question is now... can we fix the spec? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |