Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage.
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:11:47
Message-Id: 22006.51079.887370.143720@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. by hasufell
1 >>>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, hasufell wrote:
2
3 > On 09/14/2015 01:46 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
4 >> Interesting. So Portage follows the wording of the spec (prefix
5 >> string matching), whereas Paludis behaves like (IMHO) the spec
6 >> should have been written.
7
8 > The question is now... can we fix the spec?
9
10 I could find only two instances of string prefix matching in the tree:
11
12 - autotools.eclass depends on "=sys-devel/autoconf-2.1*" (with
13 WANT_AUTOCONF=2.1).
14 - media-video/nvidia-settings has "=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-3*".
15
16 Both should be are easily fixable, in a way that doesn't break
17 backwards compatibility with current Portage.
18
19 So I think that fixing the spec would be possible, indeed.
20
21 Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>