| 1 |
On Sun, 2022-04-24 at 13:29 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 1:56 PM Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 1:53 AM James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > On Sat, 2022-04-02 at 21:35 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > # Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> (2022-03-27) |
| 8 |
> > > > # Dead package. Homepage doesn't resolve. Unmaintained in Gentoo for at |
| 9 |
> > > > # least 6 years. |
| 10 |
> > > > # Removal on 2022-05-02 |
| 11 |
> > > > app-pda/gtkpod |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > I do still use this on rare occasions. It's not my favourite program but there |
| 14 |
> > > are no good alternatives, short of using Rhythmbox, which does more than I |
| 15 |
> > > want. I'm not aware that it's actually broken, aside from a couple of minor |
| 16 |
> > > warts in the package. Does it have to go? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > No, if you want to keep it -- feel free. I just saw it because it's |
| 19 |
> > the only reverse dependency of dev-util/anjuta which looks pretty dead |
| 20 |
> > itself, and then I saw how much more dead gtkpod looks. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > If you can break the dependence on anjuta (which I didn't |
| 23 |
> > investigate), I'd have no problem keeping it. Would be nice to have an |
| 24 |
> > actual maintainer as well. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Removal date is approaching. Are you planning to take this? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Sorry, I kept putting this off. Yeah, I'll take it... for now. :) |
Archives