1 |
On 10/04/16 04:49, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> 1. As you point out, its not a package. That means it works |
3 |
> differently than everything else, and it can't be used as a |
4 |
> dependency/etc. |
5 |
> 2. Genkernel's initramfs isn't all that great. Don't get me wrong - |
6 |
> it was very good back when it was new. However, I find it hard to |
7 |
> compare it to the likes of dracut. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> However, if it were all that serious of an issue somebody would have |
10 |
> fixed it by now. Manually building a kernel and using dracut is easy |
11 |
> enough, and of course some prefer to not use an initramfs if their |
12 |
> configuration allows it. |
13 |
> |
14 |
I haven't dared explore dracut because last I heard it was still |
15 |
experimental. That people are actively using it (presumably in |
16 |
production and not just experimental/development suggests at the very |
17 |
least that the appropriate Gentoo wiki article needs updating (no |
18 |
surprise there!). |
19 |
|
20 |
Perhaps indeed genkernel needs some updating. When I last looked at the |
21 |
best means of creating an initramfs, it was the least of the evils, but |
22 |
there did seem a genuine lack of tools to accomplish it, which is where |
23 |
I assume dracut came about. |
24 |
|
25 |
Fundamentally, acknowledging a tangent of the original thread, I'd say |
26 |
the jury remains out on whether Gentoo should be forcing the need of an |
27 |
initramfs/rd on its users by default anyway. That kind of thing, |
28 |
however, is of course, subject to a Council ruling if appropriate :) . |