1 |
On 07/09/2018 03:27 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: |
2 |
> On 09/07/18 23:12, Zac Medico wrote: |
3 |
>> On 07/09/2018 02:34 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
4 |
>>> I'd mostly argue any such change should only affect new systems |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>> Yes, changing defaults for existing systems would be annoying. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> My recommendation is to have catalyst set the new defaults in the stage |
9 |
>> tarballs. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> When sys-apps/portage changes its internal defaults, I'd like for the |
12 |
>> upgrade process to call a tool that generates configuration files when |
13 |
>> necessary to ensure that the existing paths remain constant. |
14 |
> I think it should be possible for RelEng to make a start on catalyst |
15 |
> updates - is there anything that would inhibit going ahead with this, |
16 |
> potentially? |
17 |
|
18 |
No, nothing. Whatever catalyst puts it the default config will become |
19 |
our new default. |
20 |
-- |
21 |
Thanks, |
22 |
Zac |