| 1 |
On 09/07/18 23:12, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/09/2018 02:34 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I'd mostly argue any such change should only affect new systems |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
> Yes, changing defaults for existing systems would be annoying. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> My recommendation is to have catalyst set the new defaults in the stage |
| 8 |
> tarballs. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> When sys-apps/portage changes its internal defaults, I'd like for the |
| 11 |
> upgrade process to call a tool that generates configuration files when |
| 12 |
> necessary to ensure that the existing paths remain constant. |
| 13 |
I think it should be possible for RelEng to make a start on catalyst |
| 14 |
updates - is there anything that would inhibit going ahead with this, |
| 15 |
potentially? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
MJE |
Archives