Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree | ||
| Date: | Mon, 09 Jul 2018 22:12:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 29b55e16-bb2e-5a98-13e2-e1482441b417@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree by Kristian Fiskerstrand |
||
| 1 | On 07/09/2018 02:34 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > I'd mostly argue any such change should only affect new systems |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Yes, changing defaults for existing systems would be annoying. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | My recommendation is to have catalyst set the new defaults in the stage |
| 9 | tarballs. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | When sys-apps/portage changes its internal defaults, I'd like for the |
| 12 | upgrade process to call a tool that generates configuration files when |
| 13 | necessary to ensure that the existing paths remain constant. |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Thanks, |
| 16 | Zac |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> |