1 |
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:25:11AM -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: |
2 |
> > Why taking it against arch teams? How is that different from |
3 |
> > "certain maintainer not taking care of a bug that holds |
4 |
> > stabilization of certain package by some time measured in months" ? |
5 |
> > I'll tell you my answer: 'no difference at all'. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> You are right, there's not much difference. However, I brought up the |
8 |
> topic because I felt like this particular situation was a bit of a |
9 |
> problem that needed to be addressed. Yours is also one that |
10 |
> can/should potentially be addressed, and I advise you to recommend the |
11 |
> council discuss it as well. |
12 |
|
13 |
Well, while discussing what you brought up, they should _also_ consider |
14 |
what I said as part of the same (so-called) problem. |
15 |
|
16 |
> My goal wasn't to point fingers or to call anyone lazy. My goal was |
17 |
> to address that if development in this certain area has stagnated, how |
18 |
> can those of us who it affects continue to move forward? This is |
19 |
> simply an area that is "gray" and needs to be discussed. There are |
20 |
> many other gray areas that need to be discussed too. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I understand we all have real lives and are volunteers. But if there |
23 |
> are areas that we are responsible for and we aren't able to meet the |
24 |
> needs/demands of the other developers in those areas, it's only fair |
25 |
> to let them continue moving forward. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I never even mentioned any specific arch in my original request, nor |
28 |
> did I call any developer out. So please, nobody needs to take this |
29 |
> personally. |
30 |
|
31 |
I didn't take it personally myself, honestly, I couldn't care less. |
32 |
|
33 |
Wonder why there is almost no non-mainstream arch team people |
34 |
contributing to this thread? |
35 |
|
36 |
- ferdy |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Fernando J. Pereda GarcimartÃn |
40 |
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 |