| 1 |
On 18/04/16 16:47, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is invalid. Replacing invalid package names with other invalid |
| 3 |
> names is no fix. It is ugly Gentoo-style hackery which proves that |
| 4 |
> developers prefer trying randomly changing something until QA check |
| 5 |
> doesn't trigger over reading the documentation. As a result, now |
| 6 |
> a number packages with visible QA issues have been turned into a number |
| 7 |
> of packages with QA issues that aren't caught by the schema due to |
| 8 |
> regexp limitations. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Please go over all the packages you've touched and fix the silent |
| 11 |
> issues you introduced. I can't afford to waste more time writing more |
| 12 |
> complex QA checks that are going to cover all the ways Gentoo |
| 13 |
> developers can screw up such a simple thing as package *name*. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
I can't help but want to write .. "If you want a job doing ... " |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
+1 monp. |
Archives