1 |
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 22:33, Lance Albertson wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 13:33, Lisa Seelye wrote: |
3 |
> > On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 12:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:09:55 -0400 Lisa Seelye <lisa@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > > | I think they should. Having new blockers come up on an arch box when |
6 |
> > > | attempting to update is a little worrysome. Or having a new way of |
7 |
> > > | doing things (such as the inevitable move to udev in lieu of devfs). |
8 |
> > > | |
9 |
> > > | The things that I would hope to see in such an announcement would be a |
10 |
> > > | suitable upgrade path, reason for change, and a link to gentoo-dev |
11 |
> > > | discussion if available. |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > For sparc and mips, announcements (and often pre-announcements) are sent |
14 |
> > > to the gentoo-sparc/gentoo-mips lists. I'd imagine most other archs do |
15 |
> > > the same. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Fair enough. I didn't see any x86 (or any other arch) announce list so |
18 |
> > I figured I'd get the ball rolling. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Is there an gentoo-x86 ML ? I'd think that would be an excellent |
21 |
> addition to our current structure. We already have mailing lists for the |
22 |
> other archs, why not x86? I know that x86 is the biggest user for |
23 |
> Gentoo, but if we need to get out x86 specific stuff, I'd think an x86 |
24 |
> ML would be ideal. Thoughts? |
25 |
|
26 |
This is a good idea. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
30 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer |