| 1 |
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 13:33, Lisa Seelye wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 12:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:09:55 -0400 Lisa Seelye <lisa@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > | I think they should. Having new blockers come up on an arch box when |
| 5 |
> > | attempting to update is a little worrysome. Or having a new way of |
| 6 |
> > | doing things (such as the inevitable move to udev in lieu of devfs). |
| 7 |
> > | |
| 8 |
> > | The things that I would hope to see in such an announcement would be a |
| 9 |
> > | suitable upgrade path, reason for change, and a link to gentoo-dev |
| 10 |
> > | discussion if available. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > For sparc and mips, announcements (and often pre-announcements) are sent |
| 13 |
> > to the gentoo-sparc/gentoo-mips lists. I'd imagine most other archs do |
| 14 |
> > the same. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Fair enough. I didn't see any x86 (or any other arch) announce list so |
| 17 |
> I figured I'd get the ball rolling. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Is there an gentoo-x86 ML ? I'd think that would be an excellent |
| 20 |
addition to our current structure. We already have mailing lists for the |
| 21 |
other archs, why not x86? I know that x86 is the biggest user for |
| 22 |
Gentoo, but if we need to get out x86 specific stuff, I'd think an x86 |
| 23 |
ML would be ideal. Thoughts? |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
| 26 |
Gentoo Infrastructure |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
--- |
| 29 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
| 30 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |
Archives