| 1 |
On 06-Mar-08, at 2:35 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thomas Anderson kirjoitti: |
| 3 |
>> Arch Testers don't have tree access. This proposal gives the |
| 4 |
>> package maintainer the ability to commit their changes. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> How would you ensure ebuild quality for these package maintainers? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Maintainers will also go through a recruitment process, although a |
| 9 |
much shorter one which focusses only on ebuild maintenance - |
| 10 |
maintainers will not have the karma to introduce new ebuilds into the |
| 11 |
tree. The idea is to make the recruitment process as easy and quick as |
| 12 |
possible, while ensuring that the person involved has the requisite |
| 13 |
skills. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Also, packages may not be marked stable until a full-fledged-developer/ |
| 16 |
QA-member has approved of it. Packages being broken in the testing |
| 17 |
tree are not uncommon, and we are usually notified quickly enough to |
| 18 |
fix it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Anant-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives