From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was: GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five) | ||
Date: | Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:16:46 | ||
Message-Id: | 20051213210929.6571b7ff@snowdrop.home | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was: GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five) by Olivier Crete |
1 | On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:53:45 -0500 Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> |
2 | wrote: |
3 | | Why not just modify GlEP 1 ? |
4 | |
5 | Going back and retroactively modifying standards is icky, and it |
6 | *still* doesn't address the issue of documenting why the change was |
7 | made. |
8 | |
9 | You know, a GLEP could have been written and posted by now :) |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) |
13 | Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
14 | Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was: GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five) | Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> |