| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-13-12 at 20:43 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:35:44 +0100 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | I don't think that we need a GLEP for it, no matter how 'mini' it |
| 5 |
> | would be.. Just asked Grant if I can convert dates in current GLEPs, |
| 6 |
> | and he's ok with, though he wanted to have input from -dev first, so: |
| 7 |
> | |
| 8 |
> | Anyone objecting to change those dates from "dd-mon-yyyy" format to |
| 9 |
> | "yyyy-mm-dd"? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I object. You're changing the GLEP process, and the way that that's |
| 12 |
> done is through another GLEP. Otherwise we'll end up with people |
| 13 |
> writing GLEPs following GLEP 1, and not realising that GLEP 1 is no |
| 14 |
> longer how things work. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Why not just modify GlEP 1 ? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Olivier Crête |
| 20 |
tester@g.o |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives