| 1 |
Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 2 |
> Before everyone starts getting all antsy about getting svn for gentoo |
| 3 |
> projects, its in the works. I'm trying to get the current CVS admins |
| 4 |
> around so we can start with that process. Robbat2 seems to be busy for |
| 5 |
> the next few weeks, so I'll have to rely on Pylon to help with this. So |
| 6 |
> please just be patient and we'll get this rolling soon. Bugging me or |
| 7 |
> other people about will not get you anywhere :P |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I doubt this is the right place to ask, but I got no reply from the trustees, |
| 10 |
so... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
A while back, we had to move the gentoo kernel patches out of the Gentoo CVS |
| 13 |
because we realised it conflicted with the old copyright assignment form: I |
| 14 |
have signed an agreement saying that everything I put in gentoo cvs will be |
| 15 |
copyrighted to Gentoo. That obviously isn't the case for kernel patches that I |
| 16 |
didn't write. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
We moved the kernel patches into a bitkeeper repo, and they've been there for |
| 19 |
a while. However, this might be clashing with the social contract, and |
| 20 |
costless BK is going away, so its time to move again. I'd love to host these |
| 21 |
in a Gentoo repo, preferably SVN, but would need to get that agreement revoked |
| 22 |
for me and the other kernel developers. Who do I need to speak to? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Thanks, |
| 25 |
Daniel |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives