| 1 |
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:30:29PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> A while back, we had to move the gentoo kernel patches out of the Gentoo CVS |
| 4 |
> because we realised it conflicted with the old copyright assignment form: I |
| 5 |
> have signed an agreement saying that everything I put in gentoo cvs will be |
| 6 |
> copyrighted to Gentoo. That obviously isn't the case for kernel patches that I |
| 7 |
> didn't write. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> We moved the kernel patches into a bitkeeper repo, and they've been there for |
| 10 |
> a while. However, this might be clashing with the social contract, and |
| 11 |
> costless BK is going away, so its time to move again. I'd love to host these |
| 12 |
> in a Gentoo repo, preferably SVN, but would need to get that agreement revoked |
| 13 |
> for me and the other kernel developers. Who do I need to speak to? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Thanks for bringing this up, I was going to do so this week. I can get |
| 16 |
the cvs data out of the bk tree, if we want to move it anywhere else, so |
| 17 |
we will not loose the history (if that's an issue.) But we need to get |
| 18 |
moved off of bkbits.net as soon as possible, and the gentoo server is |
| 19 |
not a current solution :( |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
thanks, |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
greg k-h |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives