Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion?
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:23:01
Message-Id: 4259A6A7.3040307@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion? by Greg KH
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Greg KH wrote:
5 > Thanks for bringing this up, I was going to do so this week. I can get
6 > the cvs data out of the bk tree, if we want to move it anywhere else, so
7 > we will not loose the history (if that's an issue.) But we need to get
8 > moved off of bkbits.net as soon as possible, and the gentoo server is
9 > not a current solution :(
10
11 I'm also looking for a solution to the same thing, and I've been looking
12 for you a bit on IRC to discuss this since reading about the BK issue.
13
14 Getting a way to host non-Gentoo-copyrighted patches on Gentoo CVS has
15 been stalled, presumably because nobody knows what to do or who can give
16 permission. Now would be a great time to try to resolve this.
17
18 Donnie
19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
21
22 iD8DBQFCWaanXVaO67S1rtsRAl9tAJ4/Y9vXLuGfphJsqxXqhPV9Ovq/yQCg1tqb
23 GQGjF40Xsv0JBuM+HBtAHkQ=
24 =4fAb
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list