1 |
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:29:35 +0200 |
2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:49 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: |
5 |
> > Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn ha scritto: |
6 |
> > > Please report a removal bug for this, so any issues concerning |
7 |
> > > users of netkit-tftp can be tracked. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Here it is: |
10 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425362 |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > And actually Robin K. who submitted the overflow bug I fixed, |
13 |
> > pointed out that there _are_ cases where hpa doesn't work but |
14 |
> > netkit does, so I've downgraded the removal to a simple masking for |
15 |
> > bad code. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > I guess we'll wait a bit more before removing this, in the mean time |
18 |
> > though I don't really feel happy with leaving it unmasked so it'll |
19 |
> > stay as it is. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> |
22 |
> If its upstream is completely dead, it has bad code and it has a |
23 |
> replacement, I would still go to treeclean it |
24 |
|
25 |
But if it provides the only means to netboot certain hardware, then you |
26 |
might think twice. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
jer |