| 1 |
On 07/08/2012 08:57 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:29:35 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Pacho Ramos<pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:49 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: |
| 6 |
>>> Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn ha scritto: |
| 7 |
>>>> Please report a removal bug for this, so any issues concerning |
| 8 |
>>>> users of netkit-tftp can be tracked. |
| 9 |
>>> Here it is: |
| 10 |
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425362 |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> And actually Robin K. who submitted the overflow bug I fixed, |
| 13 |
>>> pointed out that there _are_ cases where hpa doesn't work but |
| 14 |
>>> netkit does, so I've downgraded the removal to a simple masking for |
| 15 |
>>> bad code. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> I guess we'll wait a bit more before removing this, in the mean time |
| 18 |
>>> though I don't really feel happy with leaving it unmasked so it'll |
| 19 |
>>> stay as it is. |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>> If its upstream is completely dead, it has bad code and it has a |
| 22 |
>> replacement, I would still go to treeclean it |
| 23 |
> But if it provides the only means to netboot certain hardware, then you |
| 24 |
> might think twice. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> jer |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
I have several ubiquity routerstations (the hardware in questions) and |
| 30 |
I've asked Robin Kauffman to report the steps to reproduce in the bug. |
| 31 |
I'll try to get to the bottom of why tftp-hpa doesn't work. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
--Tony |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 37 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 38 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 39 |
GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535 |
| 40 |
GnuPG ID : D0455535 |
Archives