| 1 |
El dom, 07-10-2012 a las 12:08 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 7 October 2012 04:37, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 3 |
> <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Pacho Ramos schrieb: |
| 5 |
> >> Hello |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga, opal, |
| 8 |
> >> yate... are completely unattended by voip team for years. If nobody |
| 9 |
> >> from that team is willing to maintain them, please move them to |
| 10 |
> >> maintainer-needed to, at least, reflect reality. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > The members of the voip team are usually interested in a few specific |
| 13 |
> > packages only. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Many of the packages which have become unmaintained had a maintainer |
| 16 |
> > once, but these were retired from Gentoo at some point. The package |
| 17 |
> > was then left with the herd. Nobody in the herd was interested to |
| 18 |
> > maintain them but nobody was sufficiently motivated to speak out |
| 19 |
> > against this either. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Does voip herd belong to any project, is there a leader? Can you guys |
| 22 |
> get together and decide who is doing what? And then remove inactive |
| 23 |
> devs from the herd, and put unmaintained packages up for grabs / |
| 24 |
> assign to maintainer-needed? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> That would make things more transparent and maybe get some movement in |
| 27 |
> open bugs. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Yes, that would be the right thing to do as now there are a lot of |
| 30 |
packages that are like in a "limbo" |
Archives