| 1 |
On 7 October 2012 04:37, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 2 |
<chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Pacho Ramos schrieb: |
| 4 |
>> Hello |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga, opal, |
| 7 |
>> yate... are completely unattended by voip team for years. If nobody |
| 8 |
>> from that team is willing to maintain them, please move them to |
| 9 |
>> maintainer-needed to, at least, reflect reality. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The members of the voip team are usually interested in a few specific |
| 12 |
> packages only. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Many of the packages which have become unmaintained had a maintainer |
| 15 |
> once, but these were retired from Gentoo at some point. The package |
| 16 |
> was then left with the herd. Nobody in the herd was interested to |
| 17 |
> maintain them but nobody was sufficiently motivated to speak out |
| 18 |
> against this either. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Does voip herd belong to any project, is there a leader? Can you guys |
| 21 |
get together and decide who is doing what? And then remove inactive |
| 22 |
devs from the herd, and put unmaintained packages up for grabs / |
| 23 |
assign to maintainer-needed? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
That would make things more transparent and maybe get some movement in |
| 26 |
open bugs. |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Cheers, |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 31 |
Gentoo developer |
| 32 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |
Archives