Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 19 -- Gentoo Stable Portage Tree
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 21:42:14
Message-Id: 200402022103.18740.pauldv@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 19 -- Gentoo Stable Portage Tree by Kurt Lieber
1 On Monday 02 February 2004 16:17, Kurt Lieber wrote:
2 > All --
3 >
4 > I've posted GLEP 19 which talks about the inclusion of a new 'stable' tree
5 > in portage that is updated on a periodic basis and only contains security
6 > and major bugfixes out of cycle.
7 >
8 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0019.html
9 >
10 > Please take a moment to review the GLEP and offer any feedback or ask any
11 > questions.
12
13 Could you explain why you think that architecture specific stable keywords are
14 necessary? Would that not create a too big strain on the arch developers. If
15 a package is stable on an arch shouldn't it also be automatically a candidate
16 for the stable tree?
17
18 Paul
19
20 --
21 Paul de Vrieze
22 Gentoo Developer
23 Mail: pauldv@g.o
24 Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 19 -- Gentoo Stable Portage Tree Christian Hoenig <me@×××××××××××××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 19 -- Gentoo Stable Portage Tree Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o>