1 |
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:08:45AM -0500, Alec Warner wrote: |
2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:05:37AM -0500, Alec Warner wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> >>Could we by chance, mandate some sort of comment field in that file not |
6 |
> >>unlike package.mask? |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > what really needs explanation ? i mean, why do you need a comment for say: |
10 |
> > aalib media-libs/aalib |
11 |
> > canna app-i18n/canna |
12 |
> > and every package in there is the same way |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Because I want to know WHY this flag is required to be in use.defaults |
15 |
> vs a normal flag? Because maybe flags were added in the past to cover |
16 |
> situation X and now that situation is fixed another way and we can pull |
17 |
> the flag out of use.defaults |
18 |
|
19 |
i think you're confusing use.defaults with the USE in profile make.defaults |
20 |
|
21 |
use.defaults is there to simply automatically enable USE flags if a package is |
22 |
installled, nothing more and nothing less |
23 |
|
24 |
> >>I'm also a bit worried that things were placed in there a while ago and |
25 |
> >>are no longer needed, may also be a good idea to date the entries. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > like what ? dating is pointless imo, use `cvs ann` :P |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Right..cvs ann...how do I do that from viewCVS again? :) |
31 |
|
32 |
well, if i had to guess, i'd say try clicking the link that says '(annotate)' |
33 |
|
34 |
> In the end I just wonder at the use of these things. They are both |
35 |
> helpful and bad. |
36 |
|
37 |
if you want to start a thread about punting use.defaults, then do it ... |
38 |
trying to slowly bleed the file of entries is dumb |
39 |
-mike |
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |