1 |
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Dnia 2015-09-17, o godz. 17:19:17 |
3 |
> Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> napisał(a): |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Replying somewhere randomly with an idea. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Since projects are now on the wiki, why don't we use that as the |
8 |
>> canonical source of project members? It's machine readable, although not |
9 |
>> so nice to have it located outside the repo/ldap. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> How about... because: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> 1. You can't list developers who are not subscribed on the wiki. I've |
14 |
> asked for some solution multiple times, and so far people are just |
15 |
> INVALID-ating the bugs and pointing fingers. Of course, it could be |
16 |
> partially related to the fact that we still don't have any SSO for |
17 |
> Gentoo services, and have to ask people to sign up manually everywhere. |
18 |
|
19 |
I'd have to dig up whether we actually took a vote, but I'm pretty |
20 |
sure the council doesn't consider this a problem. If people want to |
21 |
contribute, they can sign up for the wiki. It isn't like it is one of |
22 |
those even non-FOSS tools. |
23 |
|
24 |
However, I think the rest of your concerns are valid, especially the |
25 |
concern about being able to include non-devs on aliases (whether you |
26 |
consider them "members" or not). I don't have a problem with asking |
27 |
them to sign up on the wiki, but we'd need to change the templates/etc |
28 |
so that they can still be listed somewhere on the project. And of |
29 |
course somebody has to build it. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Rich |