| 1 |
Donations are harder to push through in management then payment for |
| 2 |
actual (even if limited to downloadable security updates) service. |
| 3 |
Imre |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Lisa Seelye wrote: |
| 6 |
> On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 10:45, Caleb Tennis wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>>Hi Kurt, |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>>This is an awesome GLEP idea, and I'm glad it finally got put into written |
| 11 |
>>words. The one suggestion I have, which I am sure is up for a large amount |
| 12 |
>>of criticism, is that I think Gentoo should charge a fee for the use of this |
| 13 |
>>tree. This is, in my opinion, a premium service, and a I believe it should |
| 14 |
>>come with a premium price, even if it's as low as 5 dollars per quarter. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>>But maybe I'm totally off base here. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I don't think its feasible to charge people for access, unless we make a |
| 21 |
> completely separate tree and keep it from the public. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I think a better method would be to include a "Hey! Don't forget our |
| 24 |
> PayPal button!!" message. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives