| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:28:29 -0800 "Robin H. Johnson" |
| 3 |
> <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | To generalize on Francesco's email, how long should developers wait |
| 5 |
> | for minority arches to mark stuff stable, after a security bug, and |
| 6 |
> | then a reminder more than 4 months later? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Indefinitely. There's no harm leaving ebuilds around. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Joking, right? Who's gonna maintain the vulnerable, broken, dead cruft? You? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> | 5 months of no response from the arches says something is wrong on |
| 13 |
> | their side. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Or it tells you where their priorities lie... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Sure. So they don't need the keywords nor the package. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Jakub Moc |
| 25 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 26 |
GPG signature: |
| 27 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 28 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives