Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:03:04
Message-Id: 20061030135853.6a1041d5@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:28:29 -0800 "Robin H. Johnson"
2 <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
3 | To generalize on Francesco's email, how long should developers wait
4 | for minority arches to mark stuff stable, after a security bug, and
5 | then a reminder more than 4 months later?
6
7 Indefinitely. There's no harm leaving ebuilds around.
8
9 | 5 months of no response from the arches says something is wrong on
10 | their side.
11
12 Or it tells you where their priorities lie...
13
14 --
15 Ciaran McCreesh
16 Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
17 Web : http://ciaranm.org/
18 as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>