1 |
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:44:17 -0600 |
2 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> That seems a bit unfair to me. There's a complete logging facility in |
5 |
> portage CVS for a version that's probably not going to be released, but |
6 |
> I believe that the logging stuff is being back-ported to the current |
7 |
> version of portage. (Moreover, I would argue that this issue was never |
8 |
> ignored, but it often wasn't at the top of the list for what our limited |
9 |
> portage devs should be working on: see |
10 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11359#c83 .) |
11 |
|
12 |
It seems I was misinformed about this. My apologies to anyone working on this |
13 |
rather vital portage feature. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Andrej "Ticho" Kacian <ticho at gentoo dot org> |
17 |
Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86 |