Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:47:40
Message-Id: 20051101194417.GB20491@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting by Andrej Kacian
1 Andrej Kacian wrote: [Tue Nov 01 2005, 01:20:54PM CST]
2 > > Separate issue. That one's the whole elog thing.
3 >
4 > Yes, it is a separate issue, but it's an issue that's been around for far too
5 > long, and seems to be ignored, despite the apparent importance of emerge
6 > messages for users.
7
8 That seems a bit unfair to me. There's a complete logging facility in
9 portage CVS for a version that's probably not going to be released, but
10 I believe that the logging stuff is being back-ported to the current
11 version of portage. (Moreover, I would argue that this issue was never
12 ignored, but it often wasn't at the top of the list for what our limited
13 portage devs should be working on: see
14 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11359#c83 .)
15
16 -g2boojum-
17 --
18 Grant Goodyear
19 Gentoo Developer
20 g2boojum@g.o
21 http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
22 GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting Andrej Kacian <ticho@g.o>