Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman - I cannot handle it...
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:00:36
Message-Id: 471A4D34.3070205@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] repoman - I cannot handle it... by Markus Rothe
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Markus Rothe wrote:
5 > So if I want to mark for example sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 stable on ppc64 I call
6 > mp.sh like this: mp.sh ppc64 sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 "Stable on ppc64"
7
8 If that mp.sh script fails then you have keyworded an ebuild but it
9 hasn't been committed. If you're cvs tree is left in that state and
10 you move on to other packages, repoman will see those keywords in
11 it's dependency checks it treat them the same as if they had really
12 been committed, which can lead to invalid results. Perhaps your
13 mp.sh script should clean up after itself if the commit fails.
14
15 Zac
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
18
19 iD8DBQFHGk0z/ejvha5XGaMRArk9AJ42vBDcYe1eayhWRAaTNB5Fgop1FgCfU9yg
20 vqENF1g6ZoKw0sq99k8ZJmY=
21 =HleO
22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman - I cannot handle it... Markus Rothe <corsair@g.o>