Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "vivo75@×××××.com" <vivo75@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:27:11
Message-Id: 510198FD.5000901@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default by Michael Orlitzky
1 Il 24/01/2013 20:21, Michael Orlitzky ha scritto:
2 > On 01/24/13 13:58, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
3 >>
4 >> How about, you know what you're doing and are going to build a new
5 >> kernel as soon as the emerge finishes (since the emerge is also
6 >> bringing in a new gentoo-sources)??
7 >>
8 > If you're going to upgrade both anyway, you should be upgrading the
9 > kernel first. That way if you lose power or the system crashes, the box
10 > can reboot.
11 >
12 which can be the exact opposite order if instead you have to _disable_ a
13 feature in the kernel which would make udev not bootable.
14 Don't remember exactly what, but it happened in the past when Greg was
15 still maintainer and an obsolete feature was making udev confused.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com>