| 1 |
On 01/24/13 15:26, vivo75@×××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
>> If you're going to upgrade both anyway, you should be upgrading the |
| 3 |
>> kernel first. That way if you lose power or the system crashes, the box |
| 4 |
>> can reboot. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
> which can be the exact opposite order if instead you have to _disable_ a |
| 7 |
> feature in the kernel which would make udev not bootable. |
| 8 |
> Don't remember exactly what, but it happened in the past when Greg was |
| 9 |
> still maintainer and an obsolete feature was making udev confused. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Suppose, you're on e.g. udev-1, and, |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
* udev-2 requires CONFIG_FOO=n |
| 15 |
* udev-1 will not boot with CONFIG_FOO=y |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Then it doesn't make much sense to die without CONFIG_FOO=n, because it |
| 18 |
can't possibly exist. So we would warn with either a non-fatal config |
| 19 |
check or news item. Hopefully we would also execute the person responsible. |
Archives