| 1 |
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 02:44:54 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> at this moment 8 packages uses "seccomp" flag: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> app-admin/clsync |
| 7 |
> app-emulation/qemu |
| 8 |
> app-emulation/lxc |
| 9 |
> net-dns/bind |
| 10 |
> net-misc/tlsdate |
| 11 |
> net-misc/tor |
| 12 |
> net-misc/lldpd |
| 13 |
> sys-apps/systemd |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> for the very same reason: enable seccomp filtering to improve |
| 16 |
> security. Some of them use seccomp directly via system calls, while |
| 17 |
> other rely on sys-libs/libseccomp, but this should have no |
| 18 |
> difference for users. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I propose to add global "seccomp" USE flag as follows: |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> seccomp - Enable seccomp for system call filtering |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> and remove local descriptions for affected packages. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Comments? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Ping. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
If there are no objections, I'll commit the following changes in a |
| 31 |
week: |
| 32 |
1) Add global seccomp flag with description above. |
| 33 |
2) Remove local seccomp descriptions from metadata of the packages |
| 34 |
listed above. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Best regards, |
| 37 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives