| 1 |
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 02:44:54 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hello, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> at this moment 8 packages uses "seccomp" flag: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> app-admin/clsync |
| 8 |
>> app-emulation/qemu |
| 9 |
>> app-emulation/lxc |
| 10 |
>> net-dns/bind |
| 11 |
>> net-misc/tlsdate |
| 12 |
>> net-misc/tor |
| 13 |
>> net-misc/lldpd |
| 14 |
>> sys-apps/systemd |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> for the very same reason: enable seccomp filtering to improve |
| 17 |
>> security. Some of them use seccomp directly via system calls, while |
| 18 |
>> other rely on sys-libs/libseccomp, but this should have no |
| 19 |
>> difference for users. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> I propose to add global "seccomp" USE flag as follows: |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> seccomp - Enable seccomp for system call filtering |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> and remove local descriptions for affected packages. |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> Comments? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Ping. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> If there are no objections, I'll commit the following changes in a |
| 32 |
> week: |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Seems pretty uncontroversial. FWIW I think you've waited a sufficient |
| 35 |
amount of time. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
> 1) Add global seccomp flag with description above. |
| 38 |
> 2) Remove local seccomp descriptions from metadata of the packages |
| 39 |
> listed above. |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> Best regards, |
| 42 |
> Andrew Savchenko |
Archives