| 1 |
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/17/2016 07:05 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Then everyone PLEASE stop referring to the Gentoo ebuild tree as |
| 5 |
>> portage. Reserve portage for the upstream PACKAGE MANAGER. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> indeed |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Agree, though this wasn't the sense I meant it in (in case there was |
| 11 |
any confusion). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
1. There is the Gentoo Repo (which I always try to describe using those words). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
2. Then there is the sys-apps/portage package in the Gentoo repo. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
3. And then there is the portage upstream that occasionally makes |
| 18 |
releases that end up as #2. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It is between 2-3 that we need to distinguish here. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I agree with the suggestion that context is sufficient already. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Rich |
Archives