| 1 |
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 15:03, Caleb Tennis wrote: |
| 2 |
> Let me follow up with that I'm all for adding the use flags IF other |
| 3 |
> packages would make use of them as well. I just really hate adding 8 local |
| 4 |
> use flags for this pretty heavily used package that won't add much utility |
| 5 |
> to anything else and will add a bit of headache to making sure Qt is |
| 6 |
> installed with all of the bells and whistles the end user wants. :) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I strongly dislike your indeed heretic idea of stepping back from |
| 9 |
deterministic dependencies as well. On the other hand I don't see why you |
| 10 |
should support these optional dependencies, when you feel you can't or it |
| 11 |
doesn't make sense. Just add them as hard dependencies. Non-issue imho. :) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Carsten |
Archives